The often-instant response to media coverage gratifies Arrington. It frustrates
her, too. "It angers me to a degree. Why won't [the officials] just listen to [the
community]?"
"It's unfortunate but it's reality that sometimes it takes a wrong being exposed by
the media for something to finally happen," Kronley said.
Another Observer series published between the launch of "Taking Back
our
Neighborhoods" and the Seversville package made a difference, too. Reporter Ricki
Morell spent months examining the role of absentee landlords and their relationship
with tenants. Her research began before "Taking Back our Neighborhoods" but eventually
was integrated into the project.
Morell's stories revealed that it had been three years since the city used the "public
nuisance" laws to close down a crack house and reported details about landlords who
paid little attention to their tenants. Her reports received a quick reaction. The
mayor appealed for help and at least 18 private law firms responded with offers to
file pro bono "public nuisance" suits to close crack sites.
Results were the fuel that kept project reporters going as the weeks turned into
months and the intense pace took its toll and neighborhood problems began to sound
alike.
"It's tiring and after a while [the series] begins to sound repetitive," said reporter
Liz Chandler. "After a while it wears on you. It's depressing to be hanging out there,
hanging in the 'hood talking to kids. Some part of me hungers to be back on GA
(general assignment) or back on a project. But I know it's making a difference so I'd
sign on again."
"We're actually seeing stuff happen," said her colleague Ames Alexander. "We're seeing
these folks who have been kicking and screaming for years getting some attention. Like
it nor not, public officials don't always listen when the average Joe calls."
As a police reporter, WSOC's Mark Becker spends most of his time reporting on the
daily effects of violent crime, an almost entirely negative task.
His work on
"Carolina Crime Solutions" offered a kind of antidote. "It's a nice switch -- the
opportunity to stand back and feel good about what we're doing."
Work in Progress
Few newsroom projects last so long that they become a beat of their own. In this case
a six-month project stretched into a second year as the partners committed to doing
five more neighborhoods.
"We know this is not a project we can walk away from," Buckner said. "We have begun
something that must be continued."
One of reporter Wright's chief concerns is "keeping it fresh." The repetitive nature,
the emotional drain, and the need to involve more people in the newsroom make good
arguments for rotating in new reporters.
When Jim Walser, the assistant managing editor now overseeing "Taking Back our
Neighborhoods," approached the project's reporters in January 1995, however, none
wanted out. Walser was relieved. "I don't have to retrain people in what we're trying
to get done." He said he would try to rotate other reporters into the project from
time to time.
Besides keeping the project fresh and maintaining a high profile, the partners are
grappling with sustaining interest in the neighborhoods they have profiled.
Price-Patterson continues to represent the Observer in the
neighborhoods, returning
for community meetings or just stopping by to check on volunteer projects or visit
residents. The reporters revisit the neighborhoods from time to time for
follow-ups.
When Price-Patterson begins work with a community, she said, "I tell them I hope that
when we leave here, you will feel more empowered."
It is too soon to tell if the neighborhoods can continue to make progress after the
media spotlight has moved on.
It is not too soon, though, to see that officers Nobles and Burnette left a living
legacy.